Armed Citizens & Crime Control
02.02.05Research by award-winning criminologist Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz reveals Americans use guns for self-defense as often as 2.5 million times a year–that`s three to five times more often than they are misused by criminals. Read the full article.
FEAR of the armed citizen and the threat of tough punishment for using a gun (or other weapons) in committing a violent crime are significant factors in both reducing and deterring crime, according to the results of a survey of imprisoned felons conducted by Professors James D. Wright and Peter H. Rossi. Read the full article.
There are 30,000 gun deaths a year, which includes 17,000 suicides—more than half—and the remaining 13,000 includes accidents, criminals killing other criminals, defensive gun uses, and police shooting suspects.
Let’s assume that Kleck’s 2.5 million defensive gun uses per year number is grossly inflated, to give the benefit of the doubt. If guns are used defensively to save lives even just 30,000 times a year, then they have already cancelled out the 30,000 gun deaths—13,000 if we don’t count the suicides, which I don’t.
But there are more than 30,000 defensive gun uses each year—including more than 192,000 women defending themselves against sexual abuse. There is just no way around the fact that guns are far more beneficial than they are detrimental, even without the 2.5 million number.
Final analysis: Guns rule.
# February 3rd, 2005 at 5:39 amhehe. awesome.
# February 3rd, 2005 at 9:47 amIm going to show this to all the people here that think guns are not good.
# February 3rd, 2005 at 5:23 pmYeah, but you cannot tell this to that Aussie dork. I hate those losers. Bunch of rude, foul and nasty people. Just hang out with the Aussie troops for awhile and you will learn how what the scum really is on the bottom of a dumpster wheel.
# February 3rd, 2005 at 11:06 pmIt’s too late, boycott. I read this forum before you did. And you see? I didn’t even comment until you made your charming remarks.
But don’t worry - if you close your eyes you won’t need to read alternate opinions and you’ll be 100% correct again.
If you actually read the forum that you’re complaining about, you’d see that I don’t deny any American the right to own a gun. I just object to ignorant comments about Australia and guns, and the NRA using blatently false Australian data to prop up their case. Gun control in America is a meaningless concept - guns are way out of control and will never be brought back into control. The only thing you guys can hope for is that the government won’t take guns from law-abiding citizens because everyone else has guns and therefore you’ll be needing them.
But heck - if your government didn’t spend US$400 billion on defence every year - that’s $1400 per American - and spent some more money feeding people, stamping out drugs where it counts (like Afghanistan, were Americans could easily do it and something like 2/3 of the world’s opiates come from) and didn’t have such a disastrous foreign policy for the last fifty plus years then perhaps you could spend a good chunk of that defence budget on feeding the world’s poor, economic aid (yes, even for Islamic countries) and looking after the 14% of Americans who live in poverty. Then you wouldn’t need those guns that you desperately cling to. But it’s too late - it’s all screwed up and there’s no solution for it. And for you, boycott, I have no sympathy.
# February 4th, 2005 at 3:02 amAndrew, “stamping out drugs where it counts (like Afghanistan, were Americans could easily do it and something like 2/3 of the world’s opiates come from)”
who the hell do you think would be responsible for that? The U.S. Armed Forces and Intelligence, smart guy. So how would that save money on our defense spending?
Also, I love when foriegn folks complain about how much we spend on our military. But who will be the one who saves your ass when you get into a bind? We will. Here’s the thing Andrew, I could go on and on about why it is so vitally important that a Superpower like the U.S. needs to have such a powerful defense budget but I honestly think I would be wasting my time. You would probably just disregard it and then throw some neato links my way that somehow proves your point. Please save yourself the trouble.
# February 4th, 2005 at 9:38 amAndrew-
Some of the things you are saying are not true from an my perspective. Americans “cling” to their right to bare arms for many reasons. One of those is to keep big government in check. So when you say that the only reason we “cling” to our guns is because of ba dforeign policy, it is only partially true.
While I agree that it is our foreign policy that has created a staggering amount of radical enemies, I also side with JJ on this. America is the global police and while it is aruably not a position many of the worlds countries want us in, I often wonder what would happen if we weren’t. This is more of a philisophical question then an attempt to prove you wrong, Andrew. If you and I accept that individual societies need police, then does not the world?
# February 4th, 2005 at 10:02 amExcellent! Some real debate until boycott returns. I was expecting much flaming … I’ll reply later today …
# February 4th, 2005 at 12:21 pmIt is not a debate, just a fact. Most if not all of the Australian people I have met fall under the above categories. As for your pathetic arguments on gun ownership, they are rubbish. What I find so amusing is the level of trust you people have put in the politicians and military. One of the most important aspects of freedom is being able to eliminate tyranny in event things get out of control. How do you intend to do this completely disarmed? For you complete government control is the only solution. Why don’t you do use a favor and stay out of our politics and FREEDOMS and stick to what you do best: Complain, bitch and complain more… because you certainly are not going to get the chance to change things over here.
The other interesting fact is that you people can’t seem to stay out of our political processes. Why? Because you have no power, that is why. As much as you people hate to admit it, the U.S. is THE major superpower in the world. Sheesh… get a life. Lemmings.
# February 4th, 2005 at 4:01 pmJJ, sorry I made a jump in my thinking about Afghanistan and drugs that I didn’t explain. My thinking was that a large chunk of crime was drug-related (addict holding you up for cash to buy smack) and therefore sorting it in Afghanistan was a good way to start. Not that I was going to suggest that you should go and attack Afghanistan to sort out the drugs - not at all. It’s just that the US is *already* in control in Afghanistan and the troops preside over the biggest opium crops in the world with a mandate to keep the peace, not to do anything about drugs. So I was suggesting that the US foot the bill because a) they’re there already and b) it would fix an American problem - drug-related crome.
As it turns out I was wrong on this anyway - according to the Department of Justice statistics, only 25% of crime is committed by addicts looking for cash for their next hit. Still, it does seem to make a mockery of the amount of money spent by the DEA, FBI, CIA etc. to control opiates in America when they could be destroyed in Afghanistan. They could probably eradicate the entire opium crop in a matter of weeks …
As for the US saving us in a bind, I don’t quite agree with you there. You will if it’s in your interest but otherwise not. The US likes Australia because we’re a sympathetic outpost in the middle of Asia. Not for any other reason. As for WW2, you guys sat back selling arms to your allies until Germany declared war on you and you were attacked in Pearl Harbor. Then it was in your interest to fight so you did something about it. But thanks for whart you did - we still appreciate it.
Australia, by comparison, jumped in and helped Britain from day one with a serious number of troops - all volunteers. I can’t find the number of Australian volunteers in WW2, but it was 300,000 from a population of 5 million for WW1 in similar circumstances. That’s a serious commitment to an ally in trouble and we asked for nothing in return.
So will the US save us if we’re in trouble? Probably, yes because it’s in your interest to do so being a handy outpost. But let’s face it - we don’t go making trouble in other countries except to help the US so we probably won’t need it.
JJ, why do you all hate ‘neato links’ - i.e. research? I have an Australian friend who was asked by an American woman HOW LONG IT TOOK TO DRIVE TO THE US FROM AUSTRALIA. The conceit of the US is to think that the US is all that matters. So you know little about the rest of the world. As long as you think that, your foreign policy will continue to be terrible and it’s affecting the rest of us. That’s why we care about US polilitics. Really stupid things like attacking an Islamic country (Iraq) because President Bush thought that they had WMDs that they would pass onto terrorist. Whoops - sorry. Now apparently the reason was to fight for the freedom of Iraq and America is safer from terrorists. ARE YOU CRAZY? Pity the US wasn’t there for the people of Iraq when they knew he was gassing the Kurds. Anyone want to guess where Iraq bought those chemical weapons?
The superpower status that the US enjoys currently is a byproduct of making a heap of cash during WW2 when everyone else was spending cash to survive a war and because you made (and continued to make) the atomic bomb.This superpower status will pass. Like the greeks, the romans, the British Empire, the USSR etc. Perhaps the European Economic Community is next, or China. Who knows. Use it wisely while it lasts. With your current economy and increasing dependence on imported goods, your cash may run out earlier than you think. Look at the trouble you’re having swatting Iraq - do you think North Korea or China will be any easier?
Now I promised Mike two cents on US citizens wanting guns so that they can keep the government in check. I find this absolutely amazing and I’ll tell you why:
1) The US is the country trying to spread democracy across the Islamic world like a beacon of hope and yet it’s citizens don’t trust democracy themselves - they want to be able to bring down the government by force if necessary. What the …?
2) Can anyone tell me what kind of scenario would allow you to all act as one and take over the government? How would it be organised? Who would start it? How would it end? Who would be your new government - the NRA?
3) The outcome would be total anarchy - does anyone remember the LA riots? This is wild west stuff all over.
Boycott, we trust OUR politicians because we are in a democracy that works. Plus the media keeps them in check. Your media just tows the line with the government (many editors of your major newspapers issued statements of regret that they supported the US march to war. Too late, people) and you have too much power invested in too few people at the top. How many people did it take to get the war on Iraq started? It was probably just Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld and a few other cronies that now have over 1000 US troups in boxes and countless Iraqis dead. John Howard (our Prime Minister - have you heard of him?) is boring but he’s reliable. We don’t like him so we’ll actually criticise him to his face to keep him honest. But he’s done a good job so far and our economy is strong and getting stronger.
But you know what? I haven’t got the time to do proper research on my opinions and learn from other people who clearly don’t want me doing it. I’ve got a business to run and writing witty retorts for people like boycott takes too much time. I’d like to thank Chad for my award for longest post (do I get a gun as a prize?), and those of you who actually found the banter entertaining and replied in turn. And I’d like thank boycott for being his own charming self.
I’ll check what people have to say and I’ll probably respond until Monday when I go overseas on business for a week but then I don’t think I could be bothered. Most of you will be happy to see me go, but come on - admit it was at least partially entertaining.
Mike - I like the way you think - if you want to keep in contact offline then ask Chad for my email address. Chad please pass it on to him.
Fight the good fight, people. (Preferably with clubs and bottles).
Cheers,
# February 4th, 2005 at 8:27 pmAndrew
Andrew-
Firstly, I know virtually nothing about your country except for your most excellent voting system, your racist tennis player Layton Hewitt (not a dig) and the horrible genicide of your native people. Of course, I am not being condesending about the genicide as we have done it twice in America. My point tho is that your knowledge of our politics speaks for itself about how important it is to the rest of the world. I think you are right. It is VERY important for the world to know what we are doing. Not only from a “policing” perspective but also from an economic one. As the wind of globalization spreads, it is the American economic theory (free market, unregulated/regulated capitalism) that is leading the way, so I believe it is very important other nations remain aware just as Americans should.
I agree with many of your other points but I want to reply to your reply to me regarding the “government in check”.
# February 4th, 2005 at 9:46 pmHaving a successful democracy does not neccessarly mean you should let your guard down - no? As you have mentioned repeatedly, some of our government is currently occupied by corrupted business men. Donald Rumsfelds involvment with the building of a chemical factory to Saddam which was responsible for the gas used on the Kurds is certainly suspect as far as I am concerned. As many of us know , Dwight Einsenhower directly mentioned the power of the military industrial complex and the need to be wary of the intertwined relationships between corporations and the military in producing advanced military technology. So as far as I am concerned, you actually prove in your critism of our system exactly my point. I think the lessons learned from the American revolution should not be forgotten and it is my belief that our founding fathers were very wise to mankinds weaknesses and built into our constitution the right to defend ourselves should our government ever become that from which we fought to become independent of. (that was probably a run-on sentence. forgive me guys, I’m not a great writer)
:shock:I am a robot:shock:whats with you crazy kids and these really long comments?:shock:why don’t you simmer downnnnnnn:shock:
# February 4th, 2005 at 10:02 pmlol - yeah, we’re too serious. We need more Killzone and less politics!
# February 4th, 2005 at 10:05 pmExcuses, excuses… you can bag on me all you want, but in the end I am right. Tell me exactly how the Australian market contributes to the rest of the world in any serious way? I mean really. You are just spewing out a bunch of crap to prove a worthiness that was never there. If you seriously think that war was started from a few “cronies” than you show your true arrogance. It is true that you don’t make trouble in other countries because you simply don’t care. Forget the terrorists and forget the threats as long as they don’t apply to you directly. You cannot deny the fact that the removal of Saddam was a good thing. Any leader that butchers his own people and leads people by force should be removed. Do I agree with war in Iraq 100%? No, but I think that in the end we see some very positive results from this.
# February 5th, 2005 at 12:33 amI wish they would make Killzone for the XBox so I could satisfy my American Blood lust with lots of large uncontrolled guns that I bought from an Aussie..inthe game of course, then I turned them on him and blew him away along with everyone else in the screen….dangit. My video game blood lust is out of control. I need some medicine. Hold on, I’ll be back in a few hourse after a few sessions of Halo.
# February 5th, 2005 at 4:18 amMike, no Australians don’t have a clean slate either. As for watching American politics, it’s hard *not* to know what America is doing from over here. The truly sad thing is that in general the rest of the world has a better idea of American foreign policy than Americans do. We were in disbelief that Bush was re-elected. [I know I'm deep in republican territory here so my apologies]. I have a theory why he was, however, and that is that Americans don’t see foreign policy as ‘what are we doing to the world?’ but rather ‘what is the world doing to me?’. From this perspective, Bush is a rational choice. He’s firm, decisive and Presidential. He does what he says - he’s launched a ‘war on terror’ (regardless of it’s success). He looked for Osama (for a while). And then there’s the Christian Right (which incidentally I’m a part of, although the American Christian Right and the Australian Christian Right are two different animals) who voted on conscience issues - abortion, etc. But exactly how Bush is anti-abortion when he’s presided over three million of them is anybody’s guess.
As for keeping the government in check, surely evil people like Donald Rumsfeld are way to cunning to cause a public outrage large enough for you to all want to storm Washington DC. And if some cataclysmic event did encourage you to all take up arms, once you’ve stormed Washington DC, what then? I say that if you want to keep a government in check then be informed. Avoid Fox news and get onto the web. Find out what’s really happening. But you’ve got your gun for other sensible reasons so it’s handy in case you need it.
Communist, how am I ever going to retain my title as longest commentator on passtheammo if I don’t keep up the word count?
Boycott, there’s something to be admired in a man who ignores everything that everyone else says and is convinced that they’re right. I’ve changed my mind about gun ownership in two days as a result of talking with you guys - I apologise for my weakness. I guess I’m a flip-flopper like Kerry. We need more hard men like you and Bush, who, in spite of the facts continue with what they’re doing regardless. Strong leadership! I’m with you all the way, brother. I won’t trouble you with any more facts to ignore - to a strong man like you, they’re water off a duck’s back.
# February 5th, 2005 at 5:21 amWow i never thought i’d agree with a communist
# February 6th, 2005 at 2:39 pm