Pass The Ammo

I did not know that. I just read through the GOA material on their site. I also sent this letter to the NRA-ILA.

As a member of the NRA, and not one of the GOA, I was very dissappointed to see that the GOA led the suit against New Orleans and their gun confiscation during Katrina.

And here I was defending the NRA for leading the fight. You didn’t even bother to mention your brother in arms, the GOA, when reporting about the action being taken.

Believe it or not, you too like the government, can become to big to keep your integrity.

Well. I probably should have looked into your story of the GOA leading the suit in New Orleans, before I wrote into the NRA.

Here’s is the responde I received from the NRA

Mr. Coleman,

Thank you for taking the time to write to us and express your concerns. I hope I can ease your mind and dispel a few myths.

First, the NRA is without a doubt, not only leading the fight, but doing 90% of the heavy lifting. I personally was assigned the Katrina case the moment we learned of confiscations through news footage. I was personally responsible the investigation, coordination and research of this case. The case has been almost entirely paid for by the NRA with minor financial contributions from SAF.

Second, GOA has nothing at all to do with this case. By nothing at all, I mean just that, nothing to do with the Katrina case whatsoever. They have contributed no financial assistance, no legal work, no investigatory work, have supplied no plaintiffs and have brought forth no useful information whatsoever. If GOA is in fact claiming that they are involved at all, let alone leading the fight, then this is little more than a repeat of their shameless attempts to increase their donations by claiming the work of others as their own. They are not our “brothers in arms” in this case, as they have yet to lift a single finger in assistance with this case. The mere fact that there is no mention of the GOA whatsoever in the Federal court filings, not as a plaintiff nor as a friend of the court, should speak volumes. This is why we are not mentioning them in our press releases. There is nothing to mention.

We understand your confusion as this has been a source of frustration for us for some time. Generally speaking there are far too many who will simply listen to the mainstream media or notice sent out by an organization and think they know the whole story, when what they heard could barely be considered the truth. I applaud you for raising your concern and seeking out more information.

Good luck to you,
Rob Harris

So I decided to read a bit further into the GOA’s material, and I saw this.

So What Is GOA Doing About All This?

…Many people have suggested that GOA go to the courts to get an injunction against the offending officials, but GOA does not have standing to bring suit in these instances.

…we support court action; we will file a brief, but lack standing to file suit in the organization’s name

source

I should have never doubted my club.

no. we don’t support “allowable” murder for rape victims. Ever hear of adoption? Nothing big. Just the humane and sane way of handleing the tragic situation of a rape birth.

adoption sounds nice? adoption IS NICE. My family has fostered children all through my growing up. Some of these foster siblings were then adopted by folks in our church. these kids came from messed up homes where their single mothers would whore themselves out to feed drug habits. They would leave there kids in the park during an entire day, half dressed, while they went off of drug binges.

The only problem with adoption is that the state looks to make a profit off of it, by charging so much darn money to adopt. (the other side of that, it ensures the family is dedicated to caring for them)

if pro-choice is libertarian, then so is pro-murder-at-will.

Do a little research, and you’ll find tons of instances where a “doctor” told a lady that it “might possibly, slightly cause her… hmm… some discomfort” to have a baby, so she should feel free to late term abort the 8 month old living, breathing, feeding human being. This way the doctor gets paid, and coulden’t care less about the slaughtered offspring. Of course those doctors are going to hell twice, in my opinion.

Here’s the main FACT. Birthing has been risky since the fall of man. That means all of history.

So for you to support the conscious murder of a woman’s offspring…. is completely messed up, and immoral.

And you’re all about nature right? Show me where else in nature a mother would slaughter herself to save her own ass? NOWHERE! Animals gladly sacrifice themselves to preserve their youngin. A doe with a fawn, will lower her head and charge at an oncoming vehicle, if it spooks her just right and she thinks yer fawn is in danger. Of course this breaks her neck and kills her.

For a mother to slaughter her child is the most unnatural, disgusting act of human selfishness I can think of.

Try and rationalize it all you like. In the end, it is complete human degredation and perversion.

and for you think that a beautiful baby child would be a “living reminder of how she was sexually violated” is a thought of complete ignorance. I can safely say this because my cousin happens to be a rape baby. Thats right. Not exactly “awesome information” that folks like to put out there. But she loves him dearly. When he was in highschool he was in a motorcycle accident, became permantly brain damaged, and on top of everything, she has cared for him like he was an infant for over 30 years.

Don’t even try and tell me that isn’t “natural” or that it “scars” her for having her son.

Your opinions are ignorant ones. rant over.