Another Dead Celebrity
02.09.07So Anna Nicole is dead… and it’s amazing how all of America is sooo sad. So heartbroken. Such a tragedy that such a fine, upstanding, real-life role model for today’s young women, has past away before her time. It just isn’t fair. It just isn’t fair that young American soldiers have died, and are dying, fighting evil people, just to protect the right of some trashy broad to spend her whole life in the spotlight, while shootin’ heroine, and flashin her tig bitties to the world.
Good riddence to another piece of hollywood trash.
Aaaaaaa-MEN!!!!!
# February 9th, 2007 at 8:22 pmI show no tears… good ridence… err however you spell it…
# February 10th, 2007 at 12:51 amYeah, but when the news says something about our soldiers giving their lives, you guys complain that the news is “only showing the bad stuff” about Iraq.
I think she was a despicable useless slut, but I’m not shocked that her death was big news. When people die—especially celebrities—it makes the news. Get over it.
# February 13th, 2007 at 1:02 pmNo… YOU GET OVER IT!
BOO-YA!!!
Take that Guav!
HA!
# February 13th, 2007 at 4:59 pmDear Guav - I built a bridge, and I got over it.
Actually, my post doesn’t say anything about how they should be reporting the deaths of American soldiers. So that was a bit out of scope.
BUT - I would much rather be hearing about all the wonderful magical good things that ARE happening in Iraq, more than wackos from hollyweird.
# February 14th, 2007 at 12:49 amOsideRocker: What can I say? You have vanquished me.
Chad: I apologize. Perhaps I misunderstood the relevance of your bringing up the troops who are dying in Iraq. What was the relevance, then?
I’d also rather be hearing about the wonderful magical good things that are happening in Iraq—unfortunately, none are happening.
# February 14th, 2007 at 6:15 amsoldier relevance - I guess I wasn’t polished on what that is. But my initial feeling was: I’d rather be hearing about their work, and what true hero’s are, and not some celebrity whore who is worshipped as a hero.
no good news from iraq?
# February 14th, 2007 at 2:06 pmread my next post, oh mighty nay-sayer.
I’ve been trying to respond to your new post all day, mighty birdslayer!
# February 14th, 2007 at 3:09 pmwho’s worshipping Anna Nicole Smith as a hero? there’s a difference between celebrity status and hero status. you don’t have to be a hero to be well-known. what she achieved was infamy more than fame. whose hero is Anna Nicole Smith?
# February 14th, 2007 at 6:51 pmChad, I just figured out why you got so sick of hearing about Anna Nicole Smith: because FOX News ran more Anna Nicole coverage than any other network haha
# March 5th, 2007 at 10:46 amI know. the freakin media worships anna nicole smith. which in turn is apparantly what most of America wants to hear about.
# March 5th, 2007 at 11:47 amWell, if you’re judging the network’s coverage as a reflection of what the viewing public wants to see, then according that that link FOX viewers cared much more about Anna Nicole Smith than they cared about wounded soldiers being neglected—they cared about her 12x as much, in fact. What does that say about the average FOX viewer? That would also mean that viewers of MSNBC and CNN cared more about wounded vets and less about Anna Nicole.
But I don’t think that’s true that FOX’s coverage is really indicative of what their viewers want, I think it’s indicative of their desire to downplay stories that cast the current administration in a bad light, to the detriment of it’s viewers who do not end up getting all the information they should.
Just my opinion
# March 5th, 2007 at 12:57 pm