Pass The Ammo

Havadinerjacket is a tool, a puppet and an idiot to boot BUT I will say Bollinger acted poorly and in bad taste, you don’t invite someone to speak and then set them up with a massive slam and insults right before they speak… talk about bad form, very rude!

BTW Persian women are hot… and very naughty.

Yah its weird!! It’s an un-tapped resource over there!!

Then there’s Israeli women… I wish I new how to post a pic.

Crap! It didn’t werk…

i tried to embed that Israeli Army Chicks video. Thats a good one. Heh heh.

Oh, and yeah … Persian chicks are super hot.

p.s. the default picture rules

I’m sold on that last one there.

Guav - Noone of importance of course….just a general consensus of mindless college drones who soak up so much crap in those hippie colleges that they all leave with brown eyes.

So you’re saying he’s popular among the mindless-college-drones-who-soak-up-crap demographic? That’s one of MTV’s target demographics!

I foresee a reality TV first: “Mahmoud’s Party Palace” - Ahmadinejad and five wacky twenty-something hostages from around the US are imprisoned in an Iranian palace for 90 days under the dictates of Sharia law. Sparks will fly!

Hilarity ensues when one of the housemates has his hand cut off for stealing “Mahmoud’s” diet coke from the fridge!

But Heath, Ahmadinejad is not a convicted murderer. He’s a legitmate, although not very powerful, world leader, who was allowed into the country by our government which recognizes him as such. Any university would want a world leader to speak at their campus, especially a controversial one. BFD.

Why are you guys so opposed to letting demagogues publicly embarrass themselves?

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad isn’t any crazier than the Soviet leadership was back in the day—In fact, Iran looks a heckuva lot less crazy in a lot of ways. And yet we not only dealt with the Soviets, but spoke to their leaders and welcomed them on our soil. Because we were the superpower, and we believed in our country. Nikita “We Will Bury You” Khrushchev spent 13 days here, and Nixon went to the Soviet Union, as well as China.

Why are you not afraid to fight our enemies, but you’re afraid to talk to them?

And where are all those examples of anyone praising him as an idol? You made a very specific claim. Either show examples of Ahmadinejad being idolized by anyone significant (or hell, even insignificant at this point) or admit that nobody has done that and you just made it up.

Polite and minor applause when the man says something not batshit insane is not approval of the man in general or of anything else he said. There was not thunderous applause, there were no standing ovations. Oh, and I forgot to mention—Ahmadinejad is not Hitler.

JJ and I are diametrically opposed on probably most issues. If JJ was running for president and was speaking publicly and said something about gun rights, I’d clap. Not because the dude is getting my vote, and not because I approve of his opinions on most topics. But just ’cause I’d give him credit for saying something not batshit insane that I agreed with

Whoopdee doo.

Way to go Guav. I knew there had to be someone out there (besides the numbskulls at Columbia) that approved of this guys speaking to our kids. There is a huge difference in this guy coming here and speaking to college kids and being transmitted over ever news channel and what we did with the soviets.

Amhadimajihad did nothing but come in our own backyard and piss in our Wheaties. There was no serious political dialog going on here between Heads of State. It was just a pulpit for him to spew his lies to our people. He should have been arrested while he was here for what he has been doing to our troops in Iraq.

If I didn’t have the flu right now and on the verge of blowing chunks, I would let you have it, further.

Pshhhhhh

Way to go Guav. I knew there had to be someone out there (besides the numbskulls at Columbia) that approved of this guys speaking to our kids.

Only if by “Approve” you mean “Doesn’t give a s**t either way.”

I disagree with Ahmadinejad, but that’s precisely why I want him to be heard. Nothing discredits his credibility more than the sound of his own nonsense.

There is a huge difference in this guy coming here and speaking to college kids and being transmitted over ever news channel and what we did with the Soviets.

Yeah, you’re right, there is a huge difference:

Nikita Khrushchev disembarked from his plane at Andrews Air Force Base to a 21-gun salute and a receiving line of 63 officials and bureaucrats, ending with President Eisenhower. He rode 13 miles with Ike in an open limousine to his guest quarters across from the White House. Then he met for two hours with Ike and his foreign policy team. Then came a white-tie state dinner—then was ushered upstairs to the East Wing for a leisurely gander at the Eisenhowers’ family quarters. Visited the Agriculture Department’s 12,000 acre research station, spoke to the National Press Club, toured Manhattan, San Francisco and Los Angeles, and sat down one more with the president, at Camp David. A banquet of 27 industrialists tried to impress upon him the merits of capitalism. Nelson Rockefeller rapped with him about the Bible.

Keep in mind, Khrushchev not only blatantly threatened us—”WE WILL BURY YOU!”—but he actually had the ability to attack us and inflict heavy losses.

There was no serious political dialog going on here between Heads of State.

Hahaha not with our Head of State there isn’t, because our ridiculous President refuses to engage in any.

That being said, it may come as a shock to you, but Ahmadinejad did not come here to speak at Columbia, he came here to … uhm … engage in dialog with Heads Of State. Which he did. Speaking at Columbia only happened because he was already going to be here. If he hadn’t been able to speak at Columbia, he still would have been here.

It was just a pulpit for him to spew his lies to our people.

Oh no, the danger! Please protect us from his deadly words! I’m sure his speech caused mass conversions to Shiite Islam.

He should have been arrested while he was here for what he has been doing to our troops in Iraq.

Arrested? You want to arrest a foreign head of state? Why can’t you guys ever think past the end of your noses? You want to do away with Diplomatic Immunity, a tradition since the 1700’s—in other words, you don’t want any U.S. official or diplomat to ever be able to leave this country again. You don’t want any future U.S. president to be able to leave the United States for fear of being arrested. Brilliant plan—a master stroke.

Secondly, you not only apparently don’t believe in Diplomatic Immunity for crimes committed on U.S. soil, but you want to arrest a foreign head of state for “crimes” allegedly committed in their own country. But let me guess—you don’t believe in International Law and don’t think the U.S. and government officials should be able to be tried in other countries or by the ICC, right?

Thirdly, the supposed crimes Ahmadinejad is guilty of—even though we have no evidence of any such crimes—is that he’s responsible for the killing of soldiers during a war? But again, let me guess—you don’t think that U.S. soldiers should be able to be tried for killing anyone by another country, right? Because it’s war, and in war, people die. You’ve said that before. And if our soldiers did kill anyone in a criminal manner while in Iraq, they’d be brought home and tried here. If Iran or Iraq ever tried to arrest a U.S. soldier and try them for murder in the country where it was committed, you’d lose your s**t. But you wanna arrest the President of another country and try them here for crimes we have no evidence of. I’m definitely not voting for you now, your foreign policy sucks, dude.

I hope you feel better.

Guav, you are pure amazement? I can’t quite put my finger on why you lefties will hoop and hollar about how we must be respectful to dictators and greet them with open arms, warm cocoa, and sugar cookies. The same dictators who have been aiding terrorists who attack our soldiers BUT do not show the same respect for Conservatives in our own country. I am sure you have a whitty explanation for this, filled with cites and links to wonderful supportive journalism that proves that conservatives are all fascists.

Speaking of fine journalism, if you all go over to Guav’s blog you will see the true Guav. On his banner is a quote from Sinclair Lewis that reads “When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” You see? People like Guav believe that the conservatives in this country are equated to fascist dictators, yet they have no problems with real dictators, like Ahmadimjihadi.

On Guav’s blog you will find a plethora of Anti-conservative talk, which is quite different from his very moderate views here on PTA. I am especially fond of his recent post called “The Conundrum” where he all but suggest conservatives don’t practice what they preach and are essentially spineless. Oh yea, Guav, while you were riding your BMX in tha hood, I was serving in the United States Army’s 82nd Airborne Division with honor under my President William Jefferson Clinton.

Wow JJ, your SooperSleuthery has uncovered the shocking revelation that I am an atheist—bet you didn’t know that before—and that I am to left of you guys on most issues. I’m sure that will come as a surprise to everyone here, who surely believed I was a conservative Christian until you “outed” me. Dude, I thought we established literally years ago that I am not a conservative, yet this is the second time you’ve acted as if it’s a secret.

How did you manage to cover such a closely guarded blog? It’s not like it’s the second hit when you google “Guav” or anything. Chad’s known about my blog for a long time, and it’s not like you just discovered it today either. It’s almost as if your entire comment is a red herring to distract from the fact that you didn’t actually address anything I said. Naw …

The “Real Guav” here and there are the exact same person, except here I act like a guest—because I am essentially in someone else’s “house”—and I watch what I say. It’s called courtesy.

Yes, in The Conundrum I suggest that the advocates of the war in Iraq who claim that criticizing the Commander In Chief undermines our security will have absolutely no compunctions about criticizing the Commander In Chief should that end up being a Democrat in 2008. In fact, I am willing to bet money on it.

Chad, I most certainly do not believe that most Republicans are sexual deviants, but you must admit you guys have had a very bad year

With all due respect, I start to find you very personable and friendly, then all of a sudden I check out your blog and you’re calling us conservatives: fascist hate-mongers. It doesn’t sit well with me.

Chad, check out my new journal theme

Guav I understand your position but it is a tad nuanced for us say what you mean folks, when you have “When fascism comes to America, it’ll be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross.” up on your blog it tends to be perceived as the statement it makes.

I was speaking for myself I must admit.

I wish you were a unicorn too. But I’d be wary with the company you keep, your stuffed head might just end up mounted on Chad or JJ’s wall