Isle Royale Wolves Take Moose
04.06.09A pack of wolves are spotted taking down a moose in the Isle Royale National Park. As this is an island national park, it isn’t that big of a deal. But here in Idaho, wolves have more and more encroached on our role of keeping deer and elk numbers down.
Instead of the state receiving money from hunters to hunt these animals, the damn wolves take them down by the masses. Time to get rid of this pestilence. Idaho approved the first wolf hunt this September. Let us hope that the fascist animal rights activists don’t screw it up again.
Yeah, nature is so stupid!
# April 6th, 2009 at 1:40 pmI know it’s been a while, and you are really excited for me to say this. You’re a retard.
# April 6th, 2009 at 1:48 pmSorry, I just still can’t figure out if your post is serious or satire.
# April 6th, 2009 at 3:27 pmI thought it was clear enough, but then again, you are from New York. (buuuuuRRRRNNN)
Should the state manage deer/elk population by allowing hunters to pay for tags and licenses, and fill their freezer?
Or should the state let the wolf population grow fat and out of control, while they kill the herds for sport? This denies the state money from hunters. And it denies affordable meat for hunters.
# April 6th, 2009 at 3:39 pmI can’t wait for until wolf tags are released. They must have been hungry as moose is almost always a survival food (unless the moose is stranded in deep snow or is sick/injured). Possibly the wolves had run the deer and elk out of the area and/or decimated the herds in this area. Oh well, lets just kill ‘em all!
# April 6th, 2009 at 7:17 pmI understand what your position is, I was merely commenting on the irony of calling wolves a “pestilence” and saying they have “no place in our ecosystem” when I think it’s likely that wolves have been in North America longer than people have.
And now you’re accusing wolves of hunting for sport … which of course people never do.
Wolves obviously have a place in our ecosystem—you simply want humans to take over the role that wolves play. Fine, so say that. Don’t pretend wolves are aliens from another planet or a synthetic virus or something haha
# April 7th, 2009 at 8:56 amI do not find it ironic that we have filled the role that the wolves once filled. We as humans are obviously a better and more controllable way to manage deer population.
Wolves kill and leave deer. I should have phrased it as “kill for thrill”. Should a hunter ever kill and leave an animal, great trouble would follow after (should they get caught). Hunters take home the meat, and make good use of it.
So, once again, humans are a more responsible and better option to use for managing deer population.
You seem to be the big wolf expert now. /sarcasm What place do they have in our ecosystem? They’ve been nearly wiped out forever now, and there has been zero impact on the ecosystem.
And my post has not insinuated that wolves are alien. Only that they are currently useless, and more trouble than anything else.
# April 7th, 2009 at 3:12 pmMy mother’s last name, when translated from Croatian, means “Wolf.” That clearly makes me a wolf expert.
Bears and mountain lions either guard or hide their kills, wolves leave their leftovers so they help the scavengers of the ecosystem survive
# April 7th, 2009 at 3:41 pmObviously, the scavengers haven’t had a problem surviving without the wolf for the longest of times.
# April 7th, 2009 at 3:53 pmDude, you can’t just get rid of a species, you can control it, but not make it extinct. It’s stupid to just think you can get rid of a species.
# April 8th, 2009 at 5:22 pmHey, my concern is getting them out of Idaho. I really don’t care if they take out the Canadian herds. That’s their problem.
And if the only wolves in the world happen to all live in Idaho, then sure… let’s get rid of the species.
And for debate sake, you can’t say “you can’t get rid of a species” and then fail to provide a good reason why not.
# April 8th, 2009 at 7:52 pmI’ve decided to research where exactly these photos came from, and discovered they were taken via helicopter by a scientist in the Isle Royale National Park off the coast of Michigan.
So, these are not Idaho wolves. And the title and info has been corrected.
But I want to be clear that I still stand on wolves being removed from Idaho. After all, they were introduced in 1996. Idaho has done very well without them. And I know for a fact the huge support there is in this area as far as removing them.
So let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that Idaho needs them to survive.
# April 8th, 2009 at 8:30 pmI’m down to get rid of all the penguins. What logical animal would want to live in Antarctica!
# April 8th, 2009 at 8:31 pmNo Chad, they were not introduced in 1996, they were REintroduced—there is a huge difference. I’m not saying Idaho “needs” them, but you keep making it sound as if it’s unnatural for them to be in Idaho in the first place.
# April 11th, 2009 at 6:18 am“And for debate sake, you can’t say “you can’t get rid of a species” and then fail to provide a good reason why not”
I was basing this statement on the fact that all animals have an intrinsic value (man that sounds really hippie)to life. I guess i need to clarify when you said get rid, do you mean out of Idaho or as a species in general?
# April 11th, 2009 at 7:40 pmtouche, they were REintroduced. So it went from half a pack of native wolves, to several more. Point being, that we we’re doing good before hand. The deer/elk herds were strong. Hunters and conservationists put forward alot of money to harvest these animals. Now we dont have that option. They’ve cut back on how many deer tags are avaialable, and opened the season on wolves. I would rather shoot a deer and feed my family, than shoot a stupid wolf, and leave it to rot.
# April 17th, 2009 at 6:22 pmYes, I understand.
# April 21st, 2009 at 7:35 am